|
|
|
 |
| |
|
| |
An
Argument
It is worth paying attention
to the artist's view of his own works. "My concern
is to give visibility to the issues related to
painting: color, composition, form, matter (...).
It is not a conceptual approach. I consider my
current work as painting fixing the boundaries
of the three-dimensional. That is why I call each
of these pieces a painting-object". (1)
Fernando Velloso said that in 1989, a moment when
he was working with big pieces made with metal
sheets, and painting as it is usually understood
(working with paint and brushes) was practically
non-existent. However, the range of posed questions,
excluding the theme of surface building, informs
us of an ongoing process since 1987, when his
works' visuality already contemplates the opposition
between geometry and organic surfaces, although
it does so with a gestural bent.
From that moment on, the oscillation
between figurative and non-figurative was replaced
by a clear preference for the latter. Fernando
Velloso himself said that his language "has come
to abstraction after 13 years of figurative art
in a long and fairly sensible trajectory" (2)
an attempt to make a deeper exploration into what
he considered essential for pictorial thinking.
And important point in this "patient transition"
is the series "Muros e Tapumes" (Walls and Planks)
in 1987 and 1988. In this series, there was already
a frantic juxtaposition of geometrical structure
and "scratches, stains, accidental forms that
served as inspiration and reference in the treatment
of color, matter, and textures". |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|